If you have not seen The Hangover Part III, then stop reading. Or continue. As always, I don’t care, but don’t blame me if you see something you don’t want to. Then again, if you did see the movie, you probably saw some things you didn’t want to, so…yeah.
* * *
I don’t really know how to “review” The Hangover Part III. I mean, I don’t actually know how to review any movies, really, but this one in particular is tough. Like I’ve mentioned before (I think), I generally have a pretty good idea what to expect from a movie when I sit down. When I go to a comedy like this one, I don’t expect to walk away thinking what an epic piece of cinema it is. I expect to laugh, and laugh hard, and often.
As you may have seen some critics say, that didn’t exactly happen.
That’s not to say there weren’t laughs in the movie; there were. But if you expected rip-roaring antics and side-splitting sight gags, well, sorry. This movie actually had a plot.
To sum it up: Phil, Stu, and Doug are driving Alan to a treatment facility in Arizona (for his unnamed mental illness) when they are run off the road by drug kingpin Marshall. It turns out that before he was arrested, Chow stole $21 million in gold from Marshall. Chow broke out of prison, and Marshall knows that Alan has been exchanging emails with him. Marshall kidnaps Doug (poor Doug) and gives Phil, Stu, and Alan three days to bring Chow to him or he will kill Doug.
So there’s no piecing together of the previous night’s events. No one is missing, per se. It’s simply a movie featuring the same characters that has plot elements that recurred from previous installments. And there’s nothing wrong with that, really.
Others have said that this was more of a “Chow” movie – he is in it constantly, and while Ken Jeong plays the part well, part of the appeal of Chow was his random appearances. Him being around constantly kind of detracts from that. I agree.
But my bigger problem is the focus on Alan. I found his character in the The Hangover to be funny, for sure. But there is a point of saturation with a character like that, and I think I reached it sometime during Due Date.
(Side note: I feel like Zach Galifianakis essentially played “Alan” during the film Due Date. You probably figured that out by now.)
Once The Hangover Part II came around, I was kind of tired of Alan, even though Galifianakis’ performance in the franchise is a highlight for many. Part III focuses way too much on Alan for my taste. If there ever was, for any reason, a Part IV, I would consider staying away if Alan is involved.
Oh, who am I kidding? I’d go watch the movie and then complain about him afterwards.
The Hangover Part III has its share of shield-your-eyes comedy, and it actually has a little bit of action and drama. But if you’re looking for a(nother) rehash of The Hangover, I’d suggest re-watching the original instead.